home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Offline 2 / NetNews Offline Volume 2.iso / news / comp / lang / c++-part2 / 14082 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1996-08-05  |  981 b 
  1. Path: druid.borland.com!usenet
  2. From: Jeff Jenkins <jjenkins@wpo.borland.com>
  3. Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
  4. Subject: Re: MFC or OWL?
  5. Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 09:27:57 -0800
  6. Organization: Borland International
  7. Message-ID: <315ACC1D.45AA@wpo.borland.com>
  8. References: <DKKv8H.K35@iquest.net> <4i8od1$clt@Steinlager.tip.net> <4ipmh6$79g@btree.brooktree.com> <1996Mar25.132903.546@friend.kastle.com> <3156F25D.3F09@wpo.borland.com> <4jce1s$qbf@mailgate.lexis-nexis.com>
  9. NNTP-Posting-Host: beastly.borland.com
  10. Mime-Version: 1.0
  11. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
  12. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
  13. X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win95; I)
  14.  
  15. Doug Matthews wrote:
  16. > 
  17. > >Borland C++ 5.0 supports MFC because many C++ programmers prefer
  18. > >the Borland environment but have to maintain programs that were
  19. > >developed using MFC.
  20. > 
  21. > Anyone know if BC++ 5.0 supports the 16-bit MFC or does it just support the
  22. > 32-bit version?
  23.  
  24. BC++ supports MFC 3.2 and 4.0, which are both 32-bit frameworks. 
  25.  
  26. -- jrj
  27.